 |
 |
 |
Stabilizing World Population
|
|
Preferred State:
World population is stable
Problem State: World
population is increasing by 90 million people per year
Strategy 9: Empowering Women
The world's human population has more than doubled since
1950. High rates of population growth exacerbate almost all
of the problems of developed and developing nations by overburdening
systems designed to meet the needs of much smaller populations.
If current trends continue, the world population could grow
by another five billion in just fifty more years. Most of
the growth is projected to occur in the world's poorest regions,
whose fragile infrastructures and ecosystems are already overburdened.(102)
Many population researchers have emphasized that current trends
are unlikely to continue. More plausible is that the world
population will level off within decades, either as a result
of an effective plan to stabilize it, or as a result of rising
death rates in overpopulated developing countries.
Surveys in developing countries indicate that most women
of childbearing age would like to increase the spacing between
their pregnancies or stop having children altogether. There
are 300 million couples in the developing world who do not
want any more children but who are not using any effective
means of limiting family size.(103)
If women who do not want to become pregnant are empowered
to exercise that choice, population growth rates in the developing
world fall by about 30%.(104)
By making family planning services universally available,
providing financial incentives to allow women to realize their
goal of a smaller family, and improving prenatal and infant
health care and the education of women, the world's population
can be stabilized.
Costs/Benefits
Such a program would have a cost averaging $10.5 billion
per year for ten years.(105)
An investment of this kind and magnitude would increase national
and world stability and help to insure progress in all of
the other initiatives. There would be a large reduction in
the more than 36.5 million illegal abortions performed each
year-and in the attendant 180,000 deaths of young women per
year as a result of bungled abortions.(106)
In addition, infant and maternal death rates would decline
substantially as improvements in female educational opportunities
steadily raise the literacy rate for women. Family incomes
in developing nations would also grow under the plan, as a
result of high rates of education and better health. The experiences
of developed nations suggest that the population stabilization
program would become self-sustaining when combined with the
successes of the other strategies listed in this Report.
The $10.5 billion per year for ten years cost of this program
is 1.3% of the world's annual military expenditures. Assuming
that the population stabilization program saves 150,000 lives
per year, the amount the world would save by implementing
the program would be over $130 billion.(107)
Regenerating the Environment
The initiatives outlined so far, if aggressively implemented
within the next ten years, could fulfill the basic human needs
for food, water, shelter, health care, energy and education
for all of humanity. To insure that these conditions
are lasting, major efforts will also be needed to protect
the environment.
Next Strategy >
What the World Wants Chart >
Eighteen Strategies...
...for tackling the major problems confronting humanity:
1. Eliminate Starvation and Malnourishment >
2. Provide Health Care & AIDS Control >
3. Provide Shelter >
4. Provide Clean Safe Water >
5. Eliminate Illiteracy >
6. Provide Clean, Safe Energy: Efficiency >
7. Provide Clean, Safe Energy: Renewables >
8. Retire Developing Nations Debt >
9. Stabilize Population (current page)
10. Prevent Soil Erosion >
11. Stop Deforestation >
12. Stop Ozone Depletion >
13. Prevent Acid Rain >
14. Prevent Global Warming >
15. Remove Landmines >
16. Refugee Relief >
17. Eliminating Nuclear Weapons >
18. Build Democracy >
*Sources:
The What the World Wants Project
is by Medard Gabel and the research staff of the World Game
Institute. The material in this section of Media Hell is quoted
directly from that research. Credits, Major References & Footnotes > |